2011-11-25 11:10:29 版主
Does we should build nuclear power center?
A huge earthquake has destroyed a large part of northeastern Japan. The earthquake has caused people’s death and missing. It also made sorrow and grief. However, the crisis at the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power center is the worst Japan has ever faced. firefighters and military are risking their lives to control situation. People are full of fears about the effect of radiation.
The destruction in Japan makes people consider more about whether we should use more nuclear energy or not. Even some ones say that the earthquake which makes thousands of people have no shelter and eventually brings the tsunami is caused by false starting Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Station.
Because of the earthquake occurred in Japan. The crisis of nuclear energy is mentioned again. Some government announced they would stop nuclear energy plans until them are reconsidered. however some developing country such as China and India will continue with plans to build nuclear reactors. what is our opinion ? I think nuclear energy is the only choose of human to solve energy crisis.
The earthquake happened in Japan has brought us big disaster. The influence of the explosions of nuclear power station is especially serious. The damage caused by natural disaster might be recovered soon, but destroy caused of the radiation will last for thousands of years. So people are now concentrating on criticizing the nuclear energy.
Nuclear power used to be regarded as a good replacement for the age old fossil fuels for various advantages that it has over the other sources of energy. But the earthquake in Japan and the subsequent loss of control over nuclear reactors at the Fukushima power plant teach us a lesson. Nuclear energy also comes with its share of risks. When we determine whether this source of energy is efficient for development of power or not, the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy need to be taken into consideration.
With the rapid development of the world, many countries have to face the shortage of energy. To solve this problem, most of them have been focusing on researching new energies. Then nuclear power stations have come out in succession. Nuclear power had been considered to be a kind of safe and efficient energy until the accident of Chernobyl happened. And this time, the earthquake in Japan, once again sounded the alarm to us. Some so-called “experts” were very quick to claim that we should abandon nuclear power for its great threat. But I just can’t go along with the idea.
With the global warming issues that are surrounding us and the desire to find a solution to the energy crisis, the use of nuclear has an ability to solve many problems than it will cause.
To sum up, the nuclear energy is not good enough. So nuclear energy is not a permanent solution to the energy problem but a temporary one at best now. We should not stop the nuclear energy plan for one disaster. And the nuclear power will continue to be safer and better when the designing and maintenance of nuclear reactors are improved. At last, we should know that the long term solution to the energy problem lies in developing technology based on renewable energy sources like wind energy, solar energy and so on.
In a word,it takes our common efforts to develop nuclear energy.For the peaceful future, the pay-off will be worth the sweat we shed.